Following his return to the American presidency, Donald Trump reaffirmed his desire to liberate energy production in the United States, while firmly opposing wind and solar energy. Considering wind energy to be a “economic and environmental disaster,” he has pledged to block any new projects in this sector, putting an end to massive subsidies. His approach aims to favor fossil fuels to ensure the country’s “energy independence,” despite global advancements toward renewable energies. This policy contrasts with international efforts to transform energy mixes, such as those observed in Germany and Japan.
Trump and Energy: A Radical Position Against Wind and Solar
Donald Trump, during his second term, seems determined to reshape the energy future of the United States. By insisting on a liberation of fossil fuels, the president does not hide his hostility toward wind and solar projects. Labeled as “economic disasters” by Trump, these two technologies are kept at bay. The promotion of oil and gas is prioritized, with the idea of strengthening the energy dominance of the United States. This bold policy, through its executive orders, raises questions about the legality and environmental impact of such decisions. According to the Trump administration, abandoning subsidies for renewable energies is essential to stabilize the national economy.
The Consequences of Trump’s Fossil Fuel Policies
The refusal to subsidize wind and solar energy could have negative repercussions on many industrial sectors. The cessation of these supports jeopardizes the country’s environmental goals, reversing years of progress toward a energy transition. Trump thus aims to liberate fossil fuels, promising an energy future dependent on coal and oil. Experts worry that this archaic energy vision could harm the competitiveness of the United States on the global stage. By betting on fossil fuels, Trump defies global trends, where many nations are investing heavily in green technologies.
The Uncertain Future of Renewable Energies Under Trump
The decisions of the Trump administration leave the renewable energy sector in uncertainty. Ongoing projects could suffer from a lack of funding and incentives. Despite these obstacles, a significant portion of the American population remains determined to pursue this path. The States like California continue to favor a green future, resisting federal pressures. The tensions between national and local policies illustrate an ideological battle over the country’s energy future.
